Kissena Forum Archive

Paris-Roubaix

169 comments · 991 views
Watching John Degrnkolb after the finish was heartbreaking on so many levels
Agreed ,but also everyone knows that the smooth line is the risky line 
@Jules
Also another step forward in equipment and nutrition  :p

Another record falls as Mathieu van der Poel clocks fastest ever Paris-Roubaix

Didn’t they say there was a big tailwind at least in the beginning? Is aero one way a sail the other? 😉 lol either way the race did not disappoint, what a crazy tradition. 
@Jules
Also another step forward in equipment and nutrition  :p

Another record falls as Mathieu van der Poel clocks fastest ever Paris-Roubaix

I think it poignant that former Roubaix champions Van Baarle and Sagan crashed out of the race,  former champ Van Avermaet was 37th, 5:36 down, former champ Degenkolb was crashed out of the lead group by the winner.  And the guy who beat Van de Poel in 2021 was forced to retire due to heart problems.

Would love to know how their power numbers compare to previous years.  FWIW, the 2022 P-R was 5:37:00 on the same course, 8:13 slower than the 2023.  8:10 behind MVdP was Olivier Le Gac in 57th place.  Both Degenkolb and Van Avermaet bested their winning times.  
@Jules
Also another step forward in equipment and nutrition  :p

Another record falls as Mathieu van der Poel clocks fastest ever Paris-Roubaix

Late to reply but yeah. Everywhere, every hill, strava segment, every race is being run faster than ever in history.

I'm sure it's because disk brakes are so much better.
Fastest ever Paris Roubaix sure, but take into account that the first hours had a tailwind and there was no breakaway, which usually means a way faster pace.

Every hill? The fastest time ever on the Alpe d'Huez is still Pantani's, who's a few minutes faster than Thomas/Vingegaard/Pogi in last year's Tour. The entire top 17 on that climb is from before 2008... 

(Sorry for being slightly more optimistic than most here about doping in today's pro cycling)
Sure have been a lot of tailwinds since Covid...
Wink


Opposed to what some of my posts suggest, I try and think I am optimistic. 

That said, I am concerned when I see explanations that are literally the same than the EPO era, actually verbatim. This is some of what was floating in the press in the early 2000s: Faster bikes and gear. More aero. Improved training tools. Nutrition. -- 
eloy said:
Opposed to what some of my posts suggest, I try and think I am optimistic. 

That said, I am concerned when I see explanations that are literally the same than the EPO era, actually verbatim. This is some of what was floating in the press in the early 2000s: Faster bikes and gear. More aero. Improved training tools. Nutrition. -- 
Could not agree more - with the second part. Marginal gains, better training etc. As we've pointed out ad naseum as a sport matures the gains (and deltas between athletes) should decrease and we're seeing the opposite.
I don't have any logically reasoning , but I find it hard to believe that Ben Healy is a doper , so how do we explain his results this spring
Guinness.
I don't have any logically reasoning , but I find it hard to believe that Ben Healy is a doper , so how do we explain his results this spring
I could tell you but you won't like my answer ;) 
Jules said:
I don't have any logically reasoning , but I find it hard to believe that Ben Healy is a doper , so how do we explain his results this spring
I could tell  you speculate but you won't like my answer ;) 
 ;) 
GregHoge said:
Jules said:
I don't have any logically reasoning , but I find it hard to believe that Ben Healy is a doper , so how do we explain his results this spring
I could tell  you speculate but you won't like my answer ;) 
 ;) 
I said what I said.
How do you know I wouldn’t 
I’m intrigued 
How do you know I wouldn’t 
I’m intrigued 
Well neither of us *like* that there is probably a ton of doping going on, do we?
(I said "like" not "agree")  B)
It’s worth noting that while the speed of races has improved, the watts per kilogram over grand your climbs has not. So this isn’t proof that doping isn’t happening, but if the first three hours of Flanders or Roubaix are occurring at higher speeds (and therefore contributing to “fastest ever” - and don’t forget that both races had a tailwind in the first few hours) that doesn’t mean that doping has to be happening. 

Nevertheless having been burned before I do worry about incredible performances of individual riders 
I just wanna point out, this is not a joke, or April's fools -- this appears to be real:

Paris-Roubaix: Chicane added to slow entry to Arenberg cobbled sector
https://www.globalcyclingnetwork.com/racing/news/paris-roubaix-entrance-to-the-arenberg-forest-changed-to-increase-saftey


There will still be crashes, but probably less severe.  It's the Arenburg, a road that should not be used with any vehicle ever.
I understand the riders "union" wanted it  , but now the sprint and carnage, will be for the entrance to the chicane .
I think it’s a good thing to try. Can’t be much more unsafe than the way they hit Arenberg at 40 mph

Poor positioning at the Arenberg has never been ideal, but with a straight run-in, it was possible to enter near the middle of the pack and, with a bit of luck and strong legs, exit in a similar position. Groups often reformed on the pavement that followed and there was no reason a rider who came out of the Arenberg in, say, 50th, would find it impossible to ever return to the front. 

That will change with the chicane. The severity of the corners, in particular the 180, means that every rider outside the top 20 or so is going to slow to a crawl. It’s the whiplash effect. The latter half of the field will likely stop entirely. Riders will put a foot down. They will grab the fencing and swing around it, like a cyclocross race, and try to use every available meter of road to gain position. But only so many can be near the front. As Mathieu van der Poel is charging forward across the cobbles, the majority of the field will still be waiting in line, like traffic on a highway on-ramp. 


So they've moved the crash to the railway tracks. Slow clap.
Looking at the satellite image, I wonder if they couldn't have routed the race onto that road paralleling the train track.
https://x.com/mathieuvdpoel/status/1775599036214776076?s=46&t=PIWjPoFWEBhYK2cTUQjC7A


mugwump said:
Looking at the satellite image, I wonder if they couldn't have routed the race onto that road paralleling the train track.


The big hole prevented this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPB2CKXp0Iw
So I was only a few minutes in when I posted the video above... now that I watched it completely...

I don't want to oversell or overhype it, it does follow the format that Mark kinda hates, at some point we even see Jackson grind coffee beans by a morning window.

And yet, this is one of the most beautiful and meaningful cycling films I've ever seen. Simple: Alison Jackson, winner of 2023's Paris Roubaix, goes on a bike ride from Paris to Roubaix. If you love cycling classics you owe yourself the 45 minutes to watch this. 

Cyclocross tyres are now narrower than road


Pidcock doing Pidcock

https://youtube.com/shorts/CAr5jGiBRJc?si=2oNRNlQv-vxI4-qj