Love itMark Taylor said:
Paris-Roubaix
Maybe it's because he didn't wear gloves.Matt Budofsky said:Most unexpected result from the race was MVdP's hands looking completely unscathed while everyone else's generally look blistered and rough
I found myself wondering if the riders with blisters had pictures of their hands taken so they could figure out a new hand protection strategy for those parts next year.
https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/road-training/power-analysis-mathieu-van-der-poel-paris-roubaix/
Here is Jasper the Friendly Jock's post race comment on the tactics:
On one of the few sections of the route that turned southeast, a cross-headwind helped Alpecin-Deceuninck rip the field apart with more than 150 km to go. For many riders, this was their peak 5-minute power of the entire race. Jordi Meeus averaged more than 500w, while the lighter figure of Pithie pushed nearly 440w just to maintain his position in the lead group.
These are silly numbers.
I mean Alpecin marked every move , Groupama didn’t really ride smart , they couldnt seem to figure who was protected ,Kung or pithiemugwump said:Bored by this Roubaix.I couldn't believe the field gave up about 5km into MVDP's attack. That first group had something like three teams with two riders apiece and only Groupama decided to ride.The Arenberg chicane wasn't nearly as kludgy as I was expecting.
also , give up seems harsh , they didn’t seem to have the strength , polit and Kung had already featured in a breakaway
I don't know about that. MVDP had like 30 seconds on a stretch of cobbles. The chase rode hard over that same sector, and when the got to smooth pavement, everyone sat up. you could see both Visma guys just sitting at the back. No one other than Pedersen was even trying to roll.Mark Taylor said:also , give up seems harsh , they didn’t seem to have the strength , polit and Kung had already featured in a breakaway
More importantly any kinda of real effort from the chase would have brought Jasper Philipsen with them, so then it's about how can they regain some energy and attack from the chase to bridge up to MVdP or some other variation that doesn't bring Philipsen or require some great effort.
The goal is not "beat MVdP" the goal is to win the race.
We saw some really great dynamics on the women's race, when half the FDJ team came back, allowing Amber Kraak to finish in the lead group, and later when Georgi bridged up even it meant bringing Balsamo with her. Balsamo beat her, I bet Georgi does not care.
Caveats for doping.
It's not about bridging up at that moment in the Roubaix situation. It's about reducing the gap first. And then, when the gap is bridgeable, making the move.Mark Taylor said:The " sit up " happen way after that ,The race was defined by full strength Visma & Trek team absense .BTWWhy didn't you bridge up to the break of 9 in the park ?
There were multiple teams with two riders in the chase. As such, one rider from each team should have gone to the front when everyone was hurting to just keep things rolling--sacrificing the weaker rider for the stronger. Considering they all had race radios and their directors were watching the race on TV, they all knew what the gap was and they knew that smooth tarmac was where they could use the numbers to reduce the gap.
The chase had been hard over the pave sector. And then they sat up once they hit the smooth road. Tactically, that's backward. The group can ride together more effectively on smooth pavement, and even when tired, should be able to ride much faster than a solo rider. And with something like 15 guys, even if they are tired, if each takes a pull at the pace of MVDP, each rider is collectively doing 1/15th the work of MVDP. Each rider could theoretically ride faster than MVDP for 15 seconds at a time and then have 3:30 of sitting in a draft before having to take on the wind again.
Once the gap was over a minute, there was little likelihood of one or two people making the bridge, there would need to be a group of 4-8 riders working together. It seems that even with the pros, unless it's an early move, big groups have trouble getting cooperation from everyone.
Now, as for winning the race, if they didn't catch MVDP, they weren't going to win. There needed to be more cooperation initially. My guess is they were more afraid of helping Pedersen, who was the strongest of the rest (and I think he would have won a small-group sprint for the win against any combination of those riders). Yes, Philipsen was strong enough to follow all the moves, but that was for everyone--and bringing him up as a deterrent is is kind of suggesting that the group was knowingly racing for third place. Sitting around, they were going to get nothing--and might even lose as other riders might come up to them.
Philipsen-and bringing him up as a deterrent is is kind of suggesting that the group was knowingly racing for third place.
Not kinda, but 100% -- If the only option I want to explore is to win, then I can not bring Philipsen to MVdP, that's it. So I sit until some other situation develops that allows me the win. If none develops, I am ok with whatever result, specially if 2nd or 3rd seem totally possible and not at risk -- ie. Mads and crew were ok with 3rd.
To say this differently, as tired and beat as he was, I am relatively certain Pederson could have close the gap, fully or even to just a few seconds to MVdP, but the effort to do so means he finishes last in that group. So it's not worth the investment.
I mentioned the women's race because the contrast with Georgi, who I think did not care about just winning but prioritized getting the best result she could, so Georgi was fine bringing Balsamo back, even if Balsamo could outsprint them all. For Georgi it was worth the investment.
Both Georgi and Pederson finished 3rd.
Caveats for doping.
If the only option they want to explore is to win, once MVDP was a minute up the road, sitting around took victory off the table. At that gap, he could crash once, or even flat twice and still be in the lead. And if winning is the only option worth exploring, then second or third means nothing.eloy said:If the only option I want to explore is to win, then I can not bring Philipsen to MVdP, that's it. So I sit until some other situation develops that allows me the win. If none develops, I am ok with whatever result, specially if 2nd or 3rd seem totally possible and not at risk -- ie. Mads and crew were ok with 3rd.
THey needed to bring it close, so that if MVDP had a disaster, they had a chance. Think of Pollitt with Gilbert, Dillier with Sagan. Both Pollitt and Dillier worked with the stronger rider knowing that if they sat, they'd get nothing, and if they rode, the stronger rider could screw up or have a disaster.
Not that he's correct, but he's been there, and is making a similar argument.
Streaming on Peacock this weekend
Femmes Saturday 840a
Hommes Sunday 505a
Easily MVDP.
Pogi, you're in danger girl.
Pogi is the easy pick, I think he'll win.
I'm going with Ghanna over MVDP.
My money is on the Barry kid for U23
The Mets are SO BACK dudeDavid Yang said:I'll go first:
Easily MVDP.WVA is over, sorry true believers. As a Mets and Knicks fan, I understand.
Pogi, you're in danger girl.
As for WvA… not yet. He’ll get there though.
It’s Roubaix, it’s always epic, it’s gonna be someone other than the usual suspects. I’m saying Ganna or Philipsen
Mads ,Ganna and VDP are my fantasy picks , Tarling could surprise ,
also fascinated to see how 19 year old Matt Brennan does , he’s been the revelation of the season for me .
Pog will probably win😂
It’s a toss up for the men, I expect Pogi and Wout to be in the mix, I’d be surprised if either wins.
Would to see a win from Wout, Mads , MVdP or almost everyone else but Pogi I think
Possible: Mads, Ganna, Wout, Phillipsen
Who I'd like to see win: Wout, Mads
i am going mads for men's. he's been on great form and so close. riding out of his skin right now
read it’s not a gel but a salty electrolyte concentrate…, an emergency bonk saver from their nutrition sponsor. Tastes awful and hits the stomach hard, so only for special cases
I was pretty surprised MVDP didn't go down on the same corner where tadej did, but looked like the stretch of grass he went into didn't have as sharp/muddy of a dip off the road.
Mark, I agree the run in with the car while feeding had my gasp. Couldn't tell if he actually made contact with the car but was way too close for comfort
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyJABh1ilbU