I love the lesson here. Doping pays handsomely.Jules said:
Professional Dopers
Uhm... It paid handsomely for one guy in a decade when almost everyone did it. I take the opposite view; statistically speaking it is a terrible bet.I love the lesson here. Doping pays handsomely.Jules said:... Back to doping!
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-20/armstrong-s-cheating-won-record-riches-of-more-than-218-million.html
I wonder if it's like the lesson learned by those who study street doping culture. They seem to find that the only folks making more than minimum wage in that world are a few guys at the top. So in terms of economics at least, street level dealers would do better getting a gig at Starbucks.Jules said:Uhm... It paid handsomely for one guy in a decade when almost everyone did it. I take the opposite view; statistically speaking it is a terrible bet.I love the lesson here. Doping pays handsomely.Jules said:
And Hincapie got to retire, avoid suspension, have a successful clothing company, and now runs a development team, right?
And hoppers don't have to wear Starbucks outfits and stand around listening to twats complain about their overpriced venti soy 5-shot mochacrappuccinos. They get to stay out late and play with guns. Way cooler.
Spinning our Wheels? Doping in Professional Cycling: Panel Discussion Moderated by ISPS Director Jacob Hacker
Yale Law School, Levinson Auditorium, 127 Wall Street
I don't think the small number of folks getting huge payouts, but are eventually caught doping is a big enough deterrent. Most people have a very hard time accurately gauging the risk vs reward from decisions where the risk is in a different time frame from the reward, so the diabetic considering a piece of chocolate cake isn't going to weigh "chocolate cake tastes good now, but cutting my diabetic foot off in 6 months is going to SUUUCK", they're just looking at the reward, not the potential for amputation.
Doping has the same incentives and risks. The rewards are direct and fairly immediate (you win races), vs getting caught and punished only impacts future earning potential, so the risk can't be weighted in the same perspective or timeframe.
So I totally agree with you Jules, doping is a terrible bet, but most people are really bad bettors (see national and state lotteries).
Did anyone go to this? Dave V. was talking about going...mugwump said:http://isps.yale.edu/events/2013/02/spinning-our-wheels-doping-in-professional-cycling-panel-discussion-moderated-by-isps#.USj24R04uuISpinning our Wheels? Doping in Professional Cycling: Panel Discussion Moderated by ISPS Director Jacob Hacker
Date:Thursday, February 28, 2013 - 4:30pm to 6:00pm Add to Google calendarLocation:Yale Law School, Levinson Auditorium, 127 Wall Street
"FFWDing through some more lopsided history…
By going on to win seven consecutive Tours, Armstrong not only inspired millions of cancer patients, he gave a huge boost to cycling in this country. Those positive developments cannot be taken away by USADA or any other body;
But they can be analyzed and commented upon incisively and directly by serious professionals. Or you could just talk about “positive developments” and ignore people dying from EPO misuse, not having careers because they didn’t want to dope, the fact that this isn’t ‘Nam and there are rules, etc…"
Recording heretito said:Did anyone go to this? Dave V. was talking about going...mugwump said:http://isps.yale.edu/events/2013/02/spinning-our-wheels-doping-in-professional-cycling-panel-discussion-moderated-by-isps#.USj24R04uuISpinning our Wheels? Doping in Professional Cycling: Panel Discussion Moderated by ISPS Director Jacob Hacker
Date:Thursday, February 28, 2013 - 4:30pm to 6:00pm Add to Google calendarLocation:Yale Law School, Levinson Auditorium, 127 Wall Street
Steve Tilford's recent rant about Levi and the Tour of California. I appreciate his ability to stay angry.

One ball rides (swims?) again
I wouldn't put it past him for looking into that
If Lance was looking for the ban to be reduced, this is not the way to go. Doing unsanctioned races for someone with a finite ban (6months, 2 years, etc) will cause the ban to be restarted from the date of the event the doper competed in.I'm no fan but I don't see how USADA can ban him from non-USADA events and threaten to reset his ban if he competes in them.
What next, no arm-wrestling?
No competitive arm-wrestling.Jules said:If Lance was looking for the ban to be reduced, this is not the way to go. Doing unsanctioned races for someone with a finite ban (6months, 2 years, etc) will cause the ban to be restarted from the date of the event the doper competed in.I'm no fan but I don't see how USADA can ban him from non-USADA events and threaten to reset his ban if he competes in them. What next, no arm-wrestling?
Jules said:So he can't enter a darts tourney at his local pub?