Holy hot fuck...that shit is so dangerous, so fucked up.
Training to Race: Faster, Stronger, Awesomer
Holy hot fuck...that shit is so dangerous, so fucked up.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/columns/story?columnist=hays_graham&id=3372631
Took a look at my Strava numbers from the Garmin and holy crap, I was basically doing Ragot's "The Worst" morning intervals without any rest between them - HR stayed above 180 the entire time. Due to paranoia about crashing I kept losing the wheels in front of me during turns and had to accelerate hard out of corners (from 25 to 32+mph), which inevitably led to sliding out to the back to never see the main group again.
The takeaway from yesterday for me:
- Get much, much faster. The pack was moving at my "sprint" speeds the entire time - aka I'm embarrassingly slow.
- Try to stay cocooned in the pack, which requires learning to be more comfortable in a crit group which was vastly different from the park races.
- Corner better: Don't slow down and lose the wheel in front or else I'll pay for it by having to accelerate hard to catch back on
yes, but even on a trainer, you need to regularly zero out your pm's offset or the consistency won't be there, either.Marc Bertucco said:I'd be less concerned with accuracy and more concerned with consistency. That is does it give you consistent readings when doing intervals. And for me, for training, I will do all of my power based intervals on a trainer, where I can stare safely at numbers, and not be hindered or helped by wind, road conditions, weather etc. The big exception are sprint workouts where body mechanics is critical, and unable to be replicated locked into a trainer.
I tend to agree here, although given only one metric I'd take heart rate, then power. The speed at which your HR drops after a brutal V02 effort really tells you a lot about your fitness & fatigue.mugwump said:so if you've been going all by PE or RPE, adding heart rate can add a layer of understanding--provided you realize the limitations thereof. Adding faux power probably won't help much.
I'd give it an A for consistency. Accuracy can be way off. I've mentioned it before on the forum that I suspected it overstated my power numbers by a considerable margin. I just bought a PT wheel off of ebay and can now confirm the powercal is overstating my numbers. I haven't done a threshold test with the PT yet, but can tell from what I've done so far that the powercal is off for me.
I'll loan the powercal to you to try for a week (or 2). You'll need a computer capable to recording the data (garmin, cateye, joule, etc). My plan is to keep it and use it in conjunction with the PT training wheel. I'll calibrate the powercal with my actual power data and suspect it will then be a very good approximation of actual power for me when I'm not using the PT wheel.
I agree with all that has been said above about the value of HR, though I think the faux power has its place too. The thing that I liked about the faux power is the ability to understand my accumulated training stress (TSS) in Golden Cheetah or Strava or TP. You can do that with HR too, but I didn't educate myself about those methods (TRIMP seems to be the primary scoring system) and did the power route since it is the "language" everyone speaks now.
City Hall Marriage Bureau. In and out in a half an hour.WilliamDC said:long process finding a different job, then working like crazy at the new job, all tryin' to make a name for myself, then moving and planning a MF wedding.i done with all that foolishness though . . . need to bring biking/KCC homeboy-ing back into my life.CANYOUHELPMEDOCTOR?!?!
i heart bruce.
I totally disagree. You'll barely even start losing plasma volume in 4 days. Realistically you can take a couple of weeks and not "lose" fitness; you'll be blocked and feel like shit for a few days when you come back to it but your performance won't really budge.Bruce van-Schalkwyk said:Four days.
- trying a new food/nutrition strategy the day of a race
- trying a new mechanical change to your bike the day of or before your race
- putting too much emphasis on your "A" race
- increasing your volume & intensity too fast
On the subject of detraining, here's an abstract that suggests you've got MUCH LONGER than 4 days before this occurs. We're talking weeks...not days.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11474330
As far as burnout is concerned, it sounds like folks are discovering that this sport is just too damn hard to do it without a full tank of enthusiasm and excitement. And this to me is actually a really good reason to go into a season with some concrete objectives and racing goals. Some question the value of "peaking" for an event or period, but they usually come at it from a physiological point of view when making their objections known.
For me, the mental value of having these goals in mind when training is just as (maybe more) important than the actual physical peaking process.
Jeff...this is for you:
JP, I'm not criticizing anyone on the club for suffering burn-out. I'm certainly not "overlooking" the fact that there are many new members to the club. I'm just pointing out the value of looking at the whole entirety of one's racing and training season, setting up goals and planning accordingly. I'm suggesting as these riders move forward in their racing and training, they start to think about these things.
Why do you have to first personally attack something I've said, and then at the end of your own comment, you say the same damn thing? It's maddening.