Professional Dopers
http://future_of_professional_cycling.eventbrite.com/#
There is just too much hair on that there frog.
Between perjury, tax evasion and his financial dealings with Livestrong...
Something is going to give.
http://nyti.ms/TOB1sC
So unfortunate the article didn't touch on any of this.
As a friend said on Facebook, with the height / size difference, he's probably going to publicly accuse me of taking HGH, lol.
That is awesome. Pure, homegrown, 100% natural awesome.kieranleahy said:From last night's event with Kimmage at Bicycle Habitat...Two former Irish champions, one slightly more well known that the other ;-) He was a nice guy, interesting too.
As a friend said on Facebook, with the height / size difference, he's probably going to publicly accuse me of taking HGH, lol.
The points in brief:
1. Are the allegations in the USADA’s Reasoned Decision well founded?
2. Did the UCI know what Armstrong and his team were doing? If not, should it have known?
3. Are the UCI’s anti-doping policies inadequate or not enforced sufficiently?
4. Did the UCI have evidence of doping and did it fail to act?
5. Did the UCI fail to detect doping when Armstrong returned in 2009?
6. Did Armstrong or his team pay the UCI and if so, was it appropriate?
7. Did the UCI discourage people from speaking out?
8. Did the UCI adequately cooperate with USADA’s investigation?
9. Should dopers be able to work within cycling in the future?
10. Did the UCI face a conflict of interest in promoting cycling and investigating Armstrong?
11. Are the current controls adequate and compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC)?
I'm not sure there's any such person.Adam said:I would prefer to read a book about 'that culture' written by someone who had no vested interest in convincing me to empathise with those who 'had to deal with the pressure'.
Impressive find, sir M.John Malcolmson said:They most definitely won't be found here:
Clearly tina isn't all bad for you if it helps set the hour record.
"It's the UCI's job, it's WADA's job, it's USADA's job to come up with a test so riders can't cheat. If they find the guys who cheated then those guys have to go, it's that simple," Horner said.
"Maybe USADA have found the guys who have cheated but.... for me, you won the race (if) you passed the test. Lance won seven Tours de France and that's what I saw and the moments I enjoyed and that the way it's going to stay."
I love the Redneck but this interview is depressing. It's like listening to a Flat Earther.
He didn't lose capacity when he stopped. Makes me wonder if the doping and racing while juiced raised his ceiling.
were minimal."