Aug 03, 2015 at 02:11 PM
If only there was some independently wealthy watch manufacturer looking to build a team around a discredited has-been... oh well.
i heard they bought a handball teamJules said:If only there was some independently wealthy watch manufacturer looking to build a team around a discredited has-been... oh well.
twoyacks said:Testing is expensive...when I worked on Wall St. in the early 90's and drugs were a problem, random testing became a weekly occurrence...till the lab bills started rolling in...being clean cuts into profit margins
It's been pretty clearly shown that the performance gains from doping last much longer (lifetimes?) than the drug is present.Thierry Bonnaire said:twoyacks said:Testing is expensive...when I worked on Wall St. in the early 90's and drugs were a problem, random testing became a weekly occurrence...till the lab bills started rolling in...being clean cuts into profit margins
However the technology around mass spectroscopy has gotten a lot cheaper over the years because of improvement in the data acquisition software systems and ease of operation in general.
Uh, did I miss something about Phil Gaiman?Jules said:Can't wait to hear Phil "I have a tatoo so it's ok that I think Rapey Jokes are Funny" Gaimon talk his way out of this one.

But not components or frames, right?twoyacks said:....really if cycling wants a new beginning they have to throw out all the old
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Nd13ARuvVE
Actually it's preposterous. I can grow more hemoglobin by spending 2k on a pill or on 4 weeks at altitude.ian ellis said:There is no grey area. Only black and white. It is either against the regulations or it is OK.
As such any performance enhancing product or technique is perfectly legal and acceptable to use, until it is prohibited by the authorities.
Easy.

I agree the lines are often blurry.Jules said:I take issue with "natural" vs otherwise. Is it "nature" to get in a jet and fly to a remote mountain island to train? Are carbon composites "natural?" How about... ibuprofen?
My point is that these lines are way less objective than people would like.
Furthermore, testing "the only thing you can test" is not a justification, it's a behavior, similar to looking for your keys only where the streetlight shines. It may be what's achievable but is in no way connected to what is likely to work.
Really? What if it was a scrupulous but poor athlete that had ready access to EPO but couldn't afford to go to altitude? What if that same athlete decided he'd take just enough EPO to mimic an altitude camp?eloy said:I agree the lines are often blurry.Jules said:I take issue with "natural" vs otherwise. Is it "nature" to get in a jet and fly to a remote mountain island to train? Are carbon composites "natural?" How about... ibuprofen?
My point is that these lines are way less objective than people would like.
Furthermore, testing "the only thing you can test" is not a justification, it's a behavior, similar to looking for your keys only where the streetlight shines. It may be what's achievable but is in no way connected to what is likely to work.
But the line where you are using EPO (or testosterone) vs training at altitude is not blurry at all. Not even close.