Sep 23, 2014 at 06:42 PM
#itwascolonelmustardinthelibrarywiththecandlestick
Funny you mention that @J.P. My first (of many) drafts of my above post, in fact, included the "r word" in describing the bike, but when I went back and reviewed today's NY Post articleas part of my cite checking procedures I noticed that they had omitted the word "racing" (which indeed appeared in earlier articles) and described it only as a " $4,000 Jamis Eclipse bike." Perhaps they consulted an "expert" in the interim who opined that in as much as the Eclipse was primarily a steel bike (albeit with carbon top tube in most recent iterations) it could no longer qualify as a "race bike" under the 2014 BCSAAMG (Bike Company Standard Advertising Adjective Metrics Guide [TM]) as it potentially lacked the requisite lateral stiffness. Today's NY Post article did describe it as a "high-performance bike" however. I suspect later versions of the article will be corrected in accordance with the BCSAAMG standards to read a " vertically compliant high-performance bike designed to conquer all day epics."
mugwump said:I think you missed a salient point. It is a "$4,000 Jamis Eclipse racing bike."