ah Menchov on a TT bike was some of the best comedy EVER.You mean he actually got ON it? I thought he just chased it around like a penguin on an ice floe...
Professional Dopers
Oh I don't know about that; a lackluster Tour after a brutally hard Giro isn't exactly a red flag for doping. FWIW I'm sure he doped his ass off for the Tour too, but there *are* limits...twoyacks said:Remember his performance at that years tour was shit...his giro win raised suspicions and he clearly decided to go off the program for the tour....I remember thinking that his not doping for the tour was prudent but made his giro look that much more suspicious.
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2014/07/tours-first-mountain-finish-quick-take/
To me he looks very comfortable for that extreme level of effort.
John I don't think the discussion gets tired. Given there are many unrepentant dopers in the Pelton and team management, why should we turn back into fanboys? I'm not suggesting we view the innocent as guilty, just that we need to carry a really healthy dose of skepticism when we watch these performances.
I think the science if sport guys do a nice even handed job of presenting and interpreting data without slandering riders.

Here's a gem of a local puff piece on that Load(er) of Crap.
http://m.montereycountyweekly.com/news/831_tales/young-monterey-peninsula-pro-cyclist-logan-loader-takes-to-international/article_e0670cde-4394-5ee5-b970-d442d6802325.html?mode=jqm
It's being discussed on the twitter.
Rain on your wedding day is a coincidence, and that doesn't make the song ironic.
Strict liability means that you, the athlete, are responsible for what is present in your body when they test your blood or urine. By the literal definition, then, it doesn’t matter how it got there, whether you didn’t read the label, or even whether there was no label, if it’s in the body, you’re liable.
And finally, the supplement they took was called Epiphany. Now, imagine you’re an elite athlete. One of the fastest men in history. You have to expect that you’ll be tested at some stage (even if it’s not in Jamaica, where it was revealed very few tests were done at one time!).
Then you go and take supplements, presumably without verifying their ingredients. One of them is called Epiphany, and I don’t think I’m going out on a limb here to suggest that it probably comes in shiny container promising something like “superhero speed”, and “extra-terrestrial energy levels”, because it’s clearly positioned as a supplement in the stimulant/energy category.
I can't get rid of these douche chills.Marc Bertucco said:
Here's a gem of a local puff piece on that Load(er) of Crap.
http://m.montereycountyweekly.com/news/831_tales/young-monterey-peninsula-pro-cyclist-logan-loader-takes-to-international/article_e0670cde-4394-5ee5-b970-d442d6802325.html?mode=jqm
It's being discussed on the twitter.
"douche chills"
Awesome. So awesome.
I'm going to work on combining that phrase with one that Lisa Roazen posted earlier this week on FB, "thunder clean."
The fact that there is no irony in a song about irony and titled Ironic is quite ironic!JohnMalcolmson said:Rain on your wedding day is a coincidence, and that doesn't make the song ironic.

"There is no agreement and that was never discussed. We never asked for one," Peters said. "We do think the ban was unfairly harsh and should be reduced.... He's talking in the spirit of not trying to benefit by getting somebody else in trouble, but in the spirit of let's tell the truth."Jules said:
