Kissena Forum Archive

Professional Dopers

2136 comments · 20171 views
I'de like to see Carmichael lose his coaching credentials....If he doesn't lose them, nobody should.  At the  very least, USA cycling needs to call him in to answer questions on the record.  
Highlights one of many inconsistencies and unfairities of the current anti doping system; athletes have way more to lose than the people running the show
Carmichael could be run out of business by people no longer utilizing his business' services.  Simple as that.  I don't think old Chris is going to get to publish ghost-written coaching and race analyses under his name anymore.  Nor will he be able to get paid for being Armstrong's "coach."  The world is a colder place for him these days.    

In fairness to Bruyneel, Carmichael, Del Moral, Marti, Celaya, even Ferrari, they were working for Armstrong.  He was running the show they were part of.  

Sure, Carmichael seems to  have doped juniors. Probably even doped Armstrong, not that LA minded.  Once Armstrong became the guy telling Ochowicz what to do, he went from order taker to order maker.  That was probably in 1993 or '94.  Armstrong was the guy who hired Ferrari, who bankrolled Carmichael, made the essential hires and fires at Postal/Discovery.  

I think what should be noted is the cheek of Bruyneel.  The guy (as well as the others I've mentioned) be happy that any statute of limitations has probably run out on drug trafficking.  The doctors should probably be investigated for professional misdeeds.  
George of the Doping Jungle is trying to cash in on his doping yet again by ghost writing a book about his doping...I am sure all proceeds will go towards the anti-doping fight and not towards his Masserati payments.

http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/armstrong-teammate-hincapie-pens-stark-memoir-23462381
twoyacks said:
George of the Doping Jungle is trying to cash in on his doping yet again by ghost writing a book about his doping...I am sure all proceeds will go towards the anti-doping fight and not towards his Masserati payments.

http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/armstrong-teammate-hincapie-pens-stark-memoir-23462381
He doesn't need the proceeds to go to maserati payments.  He has a net worth of $40 million.

http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-athletes/richest-coaches/george-hincapie-net-worth/
The Foward was written by the uniballer himself. I suppose that means that he gets some of the take. He must have forgiven George for singing to USADA.
I've been getting the sense in recent interviews and articles that Lance's long term PR goal has been to re-elevate himself by bringing down the entire era. That, and a more believable narrative about his goals and ambitions (more of a mixed bag than pre bust alpha Lance). This book just makes it seem like Hincapie has signed onto that plan. Of course, even if that's the goal, it doesn't mean that George is lying here - he might be sincere throughout.
How is George worth $40 mil?  
George Hincapie...The King Slayer !

"George Hincapie was the "Loyal Lieutenant" who helped Lance Armstrong to seven Tour de France titles, only to later provide the key testimony that brought his downfall."

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/04/24/4078750/armstrong-teammate-hincapie-pens.html#storylink=cpy
@Yacks- King Slayer perhaps, but he still has his right hand (as far as i know)
And yeah, I would take that $40 million net worth with a grain of salt.
twoyacks said:

$40M most likely includes his sportsware company, which isn't exactly liquid assets.
There was also the Greenville, S.C.  Pla d'Adet planned retirement community/ training center to which George  as lending his name (and presumably investing in), which never materialized.  I'm wondering if I'll ever get my deposit back on the place I reserved there?
http://www.shmkt.com/web-portfolio/pladadet/press/feb9.html



Damn...I always forget the sportswear company.  I don't dislike George....I just wish he would confess to why he doped...for the Benjamin's and because he was a college drop out with no transferable job skills.  The bits about it being a "relief" to be caught is as self serving as doping.  He is just like Tyler...these guys hid behind what they did for over a decade and the second they get subpoenaed they reinvent themselves as the "Toxic Avengers" of the war on drugs.  What about all the U.S. Pro Championship races George competed in?  Was the American peloton as polluted as Europe's?  All we hear is that European Professional Cycling was the devil...and the devil made me do it.  George was U.S. Champion in 98, 06 & 09...(he won in 97 but was DQ'd for drafting behind the team car).   Does anybody believe the US peloton was the cesspool of doping that Europe was?  If not then George was picking the low hanging fruit and the $30K  check for winning the U.S. Championships.   The "I quit in 06" mantra is farcical.  It does dovetail nicely with the 8 year statute of limitations though, a lovely coincidence.  Not as lovely as George calling Andreu and telling him he was trying to "destroy the sport" by talking about doping.   But America is the land of reinvention....Ladies & gentleman I give you...George Hincapie The Toxic Doping Avenger !!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27E4Qfj7iEY#aid=P-dnJ7Idao0

neilx said:
There was also the Greenville, S.C.  Pla d'Adet planned retirement community/ training center to which George  as lending his name (and presumably investing in), which never materialized.  I'm wondering if I'll ever get my deposit back on the place I reserved there?



The $40 million I do take with a grain of salt.  And yet there are reasons to believe.  I'll bet he gave Thom Weisel some money to invest, as this seems to have been offered to everyone on US Postal.  So he was investing with him since 1997, maybe to this day.  When he left Discovery, or thereabouts, he seems to have hooked up with two financiers, Holowesko and Hirschorn, who were probably further helping him invest and finding investors for his company.  

Joaquin,
I think you hit it right.  Lance and George want to take everyone else down to their level so they can claim it was a "level playing field" and they were the best at it.  Of course, they set sail on the doping adventure as juniors and embraced it as they had no exit strategy.  They were pissed at guys like Scott Mercier and Darren Baker, college grads who could walk away without joining the brotherhood of the needle (this comes up in Juliet Macur's book).  What isn't said is that pre-doping, Baker was the better climber than Armstrong and probably his equal as an all-around racer.  Mercier was up there, too. 

What's funny is the way these guys keep on bringing up the claim that the doping they were involved in was the most sophisticated.  They claim it wasn't, yet we all know how poorly the Fuentes operation was run, we know something of how well the Ferrari operation was run, and we don't know of any more sophisticated program out there--and they're not enlightening us.  

I wish they'd man up and accept the fact that they made millions over their decision to cheat and leave it at that. 
Cross-posting that I'm not sure if this old news, but The Armstrong Lie is available for streaming on Amazon, iTunes, and Google Play.
http://www.podiumcafe.com/book-corner/2014/4/28/5660720/shadows-on-the-road-by-michael-barry

The cheek of it Mr. Barry !  These guys are still profiting from their doping by commodifying our morbid curiosity with doping....Fool me once Mr. Barry !  I am getting my $$$ back on Inside the Postal Bus one day at a time by saving $$$ on toilet paper....I plan on wiping my patootie with the pages of your first piece of fiction,  all 240 guilt by omission riddled pages.  Oh and if a copy of your latest "tell all" should find its way to me, I'm hoping the paper is softer in that one.
Oof.  

I read Le Metier and I immediately was struck by his discussion of the title.  It was clear as day, that he'd dope for his Metier.  It was also plain to see that he had traded in peering at Armstrong for money to peering at Cavendish.  The book also was on the verge of bizarre, with page after page of empty thoughts and baseless comparisons that he didn't bother to explain.  Anyone who had raced for a few years and possesses a minimum of insight could have written most of his work just as easily.  I thought at the time the problem was he needed a good editor, someone to tell him to try harder.  I think he still needs an editor.  I'm at a loss to understand why not only the editors at VeloNews, Rouleur, the NY Times, and now Faber and Faber, haven't done this.  If he wasn't "Michael Barry, (former) professional cyclist" his works would have been rejected by all those publishers.

He's a company man to the core, always angling for the promotion, always trying to figure out how to game the system for his benefit.    

But I am going to see if I can get a review copy from the publisher.  
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-ricco-caught-buying-doping-products
Ricco-pathological sh*t.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ricco-i-was-in-the-wrong-place-at-the-wrong-time

I actually had to double check that today is 1 May and not 1 April. 
neilx said:
Ricco-pathological sh*t.
He might be, but I think Mike Barry is far more dangerous.  No one would hire Ricco as a team director, and he keeps screwing up.  Barry on the other hand, knows what he's doing is wrong, does it anyway, and then excuses his activities while blaming the system.  Only to do wrong again. Barry was probably hoping to move into team management post-racing so he could keep living in Girona.  
For what it's worth they had a race series in Toronto they were set to name after Barry until the story broke.
Barry has been trying to get involved with youth development in Ontario. The local community up there is divided in support for him.
this:


Perfect. Great friend of mine Andrew Randell pushed for clean racing in the early 2000's and regularly raced Barry (Andrew was a national champion and winner of several international events).. Andrew has yet to command the attention he deserves compared to mr Barry. (Both are Torontonians)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9S4fwPR1-k&list=PLryl7KYZ5kA4oX-M4KHW0VqtaztJNjXOG#t=30
http://www.vancouversun.com/touch/story.html?id=7502237

"They even pat themselves on the back and say how they are proud of the steps they’ve taken to improve the sport and clean it up. Maybe they just found a larger love of the sport? Or maybe now is a good time to call bullshit."
That's it.  Xenon is official.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/xenon-added-to-banned-substances-list
Does this mean I cannot use the headlights on my car when driving to bike races ? What about out of competition - say when I am driving Fairway or to visit my Spanish gynecologist  ?
Well I have to say, calling the UCI, and WADA out on the carpet for basically sh*tting the bed on TDF testing is pretty refreshing.  Stuff like this makes me want to believe in him.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/chris-froome-calls-for-more-anti-doping-tests-in-tenerife