Professional Dopers

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/90-year-old-pursuit-world-champion-given-public-warning-for-anti-doping-violation/
I honestly hadn't given it a moment's thought. I think the record books are filled to overflowing with suspect records and will continue to be.eloy said:I get your point, but he did break the world record. If he was doped, should the new time be in record books?
I'm upset that USADA/WADA is spending an iota of effort/money policing nonogenerians when they've shown themselves to be so fundamentally unable or unwilling to do the right thing for the mainstream of sports they police.
Agree that they could and should do a much better job with the mainstream sports. Also agree that Bolt is probably the most suspect athlete on earth.Jules said:I honestly hadn't given it a moment's thought. I think the record books are filled to overflowing with suspect records and will continue to be.eloy said:I get your point, but he did break the world record. If he was doped, should the new time be in record books?
I'm upset that USADA/WADA is spending an iota of effort/money policing nonogenerians when they've shown themselves to be so fundamentally unable or unwilling to do the right thing for the mainstream of sports they police.
But still confused on what USADA was supposed to do here. Dude gets mega kudos for competing at that age, but if he failed the test: he failed the test.
I'm far more disgusted by the doper. You don't have to pin on a number to dope. and he didn't need to dope to win. I think we should expect every national championship to be dope tested. I remember being bummed to find out when I did road nationals in 2006-2007, they pretended they were testing, but didn't. And I sure hoped they tested masters track natz last year. those guys were really fast.
BTW,
I've been given Tramadol the past few days. I'm not competing or even operating light machinery. This computer is about as complex as to gets.
Another crazy/ kinda scary thing is that the 90yo also had some sort of vitamin supplement that tested positive for another banned substance (it wasn't listed on the ingredients and didn't show up in his drug test).
USADA seems to feel like there was genuinely no intent to cheat but I'm sure it would be a bit more complicated if someone else was in his age group. I don't really know what to make of the whole thing.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BseOgUKlp2j/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=jov2n0neyluk

I found it fascinating for a couple of reasons. First, unlike the usual arguments about disappearing twins and other forms of lawyering up, this guy just goes on a podcast and admits to his actions and describes who was involved and what he did. Apparently there are no laws against doping in Estonia, so he wasn't necessarily concerned about getting in more trouble than he already was.
Second, it is interesting to get a sense of how athletes might be trying to game the bio-passport. The takeaway is that it is possible, but more difficult than in the past and has less performance boost than in years past. The skier refers to WADA as toothless, which is true, but perhaps in the end its effectiveness is akin to setting a speed limits for automobiles and having speed traps and other forms of enforcement. People are still going to speed, but may do it less frequently and less egregiously than in the wild west days where they knew they were unlikely to ever be caught. Is that perfect or even acceptable? Probably not, but I am not sure that there is a better system out there. It seems to me that that WADA are super careful to get statistically unusual data before pursuing athletes. I hope that along with law enforcmentment that they target and monitor suspicious athletes closely.
Okay, here is the link to the Cycling Tips podcast with excerpts related to the bio-passport.
The full interview can be found on the Nordic Nation podcast. You hear more about the athletes background, how he got into doping and how this has impacted him since getting caught. I found this interesting from a psychological point of view.
"De Vlaeminck’s obsession with preserving his health saw his career last until 1984 and gave us both a thrilling dual with Francesco Moser in the late 1970s and early 80s, and an insight into the direction the sport was taking. After the 1981 edition of Paris Roubaix, won by Bernard Hinault with De Vlaeminck second — the only time he would place ahead of Moser, who completed the podium — the Belgian was accosted by a small, bespectacled doctor who worked for the Italian.
Michele Ferrari told Mr. Paris Roubaix that he could all but guarantee he would win a fifth cobblestone, if he would allow the good doctor to draw some blood at a strategic moment, deep-freeze it and then re-infuse it just before the following year’s Roubaix. After all, how do you think Moser did it?
De Vlaeminck was shocked, and scared. “I didn’t do it because the idea scared me,” he said. “It sounded terrible. I didn’t want to know anything about it.”"
In other news, the Swiss cycling federation was surprised that Danilo Hondo admitted to doping. Maybe none of them were alive in 2005, or noticed the teams he rode for. https://dopeology.org/people/Danilo_Hondo/
Lolmugwump said:In other news, the Swiss cycling federation was surprised that Danilo Hondo admitted to doping. Maybe none of them were alive in 2005, or noticed the teams he rode for. https://dopeology.org/people/Danilo_Hondo/
DENISE BETSEMA’S URINE B SAMPLE TESTS POSITIVE
https://www.cxmagazine.com/denise-betsemas-b-sample-tests-positive-anabolic-steroidBetsema turned out to be suck defined.
https://youtu.be/ac_x4ucbReohttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news/two-cyclists-positive-for-epo-at-gfny-world-championships/
Does the GFNY have a legitimate prize list? Are these guys doping for bragging rights?
I don’t know how old these guys were, but I figure after a certain age we are all fighting against the inevitable decline and want to keep what is left of our youth and vitality from slipping through our fingers.
I can identify with being the old guy who feels a little older every year. If someone offered me an elixir that made me feel younger and faster then I might be tempted to take it. But to attempt to feel good by cheating others? No way
I can only guess that they conveniently ignore the fact that they are cheating other competitors and convince themselves that they couldn’t get the rush that comes from competition if they didn’t dope. No way they are doing it for prizes. How sad
Agree.PatrickGrehan said:I find the idea that people would dope for a gran fondo hard to wrap my head around.
Does the GFNY have a legitimate prize list? Are these guys doping for bragging rights?
I don’t know how old these guys were, but I figure after a certain age we are all fighting against the inevitable decline and want to keep what is left of our youth and vitality from slipping through our fingers.
I can identify with being the old guy who feels a little older every year. If someone offered me an elixir that made me feel younger and faster then I might be tempted to take it. But to attempt to feel good by cheating others? No way
I can only guess that they conveniently ignore the fact that they are cheating other competitors and convince themselves that they couldn’t get the rush that comes from competition if they didn’t dope. No way they are doing it for prizes. How sad
These people are not doping specifically for the GFNY fondo -- that's what more terrifying, they are doping to just ride around, race, and whatever the hell they do on bicycles on their local scenes, daily lives.
I forget his name, but I once briefly meet the New Yorker doper dude that was also caught at the GFNY tests. He went from cat 5 to 2 in one season. I remember how sad I felt for him: He had completely missed everything that makes riding bicycles fun and awesome. He honestly has no idea how sweet it is.
