Kissena Forum Archive

In Print: Articles of Interest

5602 comments · 103122 views
Yacks has proudly
Oh no, you've just walked into the Yack Fu bugaboo, he loves him some low density, corrosion-resistant transitional metals, especially when it is alloyed with other metals to make cycling equipment, and components for aircraft.

 
dstearns said:
twoyacks said:
Did someone say "ti bike" ???
i'm clearly out of the loop on this.  is that a cycling lingo gaffe?

yes, it's me :) they had me wear this crappy rapha stuff too! bike was equiped w/ campy super record 11 speed and enve wheels, not too shabby and rode nicely, very precise handling. I had never ridden titanium before. I wish I could've kept the bike as payment!
it is disconcerting to see my cycling interests intersecting with my work stuff.

http://www.digiday.com/brands/cycling-team-spoofs-pretentious-brand/
Already in line for Black Friday: http://gizmodo.com/5961378/of-course-people-are-already-in-line-for-black-friday?utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_facebook&utm_source=gizmodo_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

Sentenced to 14 years for stealing a team's bikes  in Idaho (and yet bike theft here in NYC seems to be treated virtually as a non-offense)

http://www.humanpush.com/index.php/cycling-news/512-man-steals-bikes-from-pro-womens-cycling-team-and-gets-14-years-prison.html

Is this real?!?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX9FSZJu448
Jules, that looks pretty legit. Damn.
From the, "Are you f-ing kidding me? Have you ever heard of irony files"

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/contador-says-cycling-needs-to-introduce-zero-tolerance-for-dope-cheats
Ok, a small dose of schadenfreude for a cold Tuesday

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/politics/2012/11/how-toronto-mayor-rob-ford-got-himself-removed-office/3980/
From the, "Are you f-ing kidding me? Have you ever heard of irony files"

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/contador-says-cycling-needs-to-introduce-zero-tolerance-for-dope-cheats
the irony of this is only exceeded by contador's tolerance for clenbuterol.
Such a clown...

image
dstearns said:
From the, "Are you f-ing kidding me? Have you ever heard of irony files"

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/contador-says-cycling-needs-to-introduce-zero-tolerance-for-dope-cheats
the irony of this is only exceeded by contador's tolerance for clenbuterol.
Wait, is this irony or hypocricy?
Jules said:
dstearns said:
From the, "Are you f-ing kidding me? Have you ever heard of irony files"

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/contador-says-cycling-needs-to-introduce-zero-tolerance-for-dope-cheats
the irony of this is only exceeded by contador's tolerance for clenbuterol.
Wait, is this irony or hypocricy?
a little bit o' this, a little bit o' that......mix in a little self-righteous smugness and a finger bang salute and you've got 135 lbs.of bullshit.
That salute is now a design masterpiece... Ah rainy days and looming deadlines.


looks like he's giving the middle finger on this banner when really the pistolero is the index!
I actually like contador: save the derogatory language...his salute is crap though, i agree.
Well... FUCK.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323330604578145462264024472.html


Jules said:

which reminded me of this
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/micah-true-ultramarathon-runner-cause-of-death-heart-disease_n_1501526.html
Jules said:
My favorite part of the article is where the competing scientists are all like, "he's full of crap, he has an agenda and is manipulating the data." and the other dude is like, "No, HE is the exercise freak with the agenda."
This guy has already tweeted a rebuttal

http://www.sportsscientists.com/

I can't get to it from work though.
cheezits....that's a bummer.  well, there's plenty of room here in the slow lane....it takes me 2x as long to get up bradley, but i get to admire the scenery a bit more along the way :P

also, if any of you are in the market for a turbo boost for the ticker - i know where you can get one for cheap.  
Whole pack of great shots...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/29/worldsport/gallery/2012-sports-moments/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
Wow...check out this game changer from USA Cycling - no more 12-month window for upgrades.


This is interesting stuff. The changes would have made my cat 2 upgrade harder, I guess I'm glad I put in for that. 

There is one thing here that fixes a common complaint: rider upgrading to cat 1 with "training race" points. My only question now is, what constitutes a "training race" - the USAC permit level "E" races?  

"For Category 2 to 1 road upgrades, riders may upgrade once they have accrued 35 points. 50 points in a 12
month period is a mandatory upgrade. Note that only 10 points from training series or masters’ races may be used for upgrading."


They changed the wrong things.
Results, bro
Yeah, I feel like making it easier to move from 4-3 is a bad idea.

Mike in some sense, its now easier to get to 2. What's harder, 25 in a year or 35 in an indefinite period?
Well, it's actually always been very easy to upgrade to 3 and I think that a lot of the Cat 4s here in Kissena are eligible already if they chose to be: 20 pack finishes of 50 riders - that basically means two seasons of L&C cup races with a couple of Central Park spins thrown on top (it's always a pack finish as there is no getting dropped on those courses and the vast majority of those races, especially CP, are 50+ riders).  That mechanism has never had a time limit.  

Irrespective of that, the points are just not awarded in anything remotely resembling a system befitting the race situation.  31 miles in a field of 21 earns you the same as 100 miles in a field of 50??  You can win the Harlem Crit (a national race, on TV, held once a year, drawing riders from all over the North East) and get the same points as an FBF 'crit' of which there are many throughout the year??  Also, 'road race' at 31 miles?  It should be 50 minimum to constitute a road race.  State Championships, which offer the state 'championship' title, get the same points as a race of which there are 20 iterations per year?

I think they are really missing a a trick with the upgrade system.  If 'national' or 'interstate' races were given more clout in terms of upgrade points, then we would not see races like Tokeneke (Connecticut state Champs) or the Longsjo Classic suffering so much (both cancelled this year): there'd be more of an incentive to go.  As is, one can just do a small local race and achieve the same result.
Adam really nailed it.

If I didn't know better I'd have said this new ruling is a prank.  Probably adds validity to the idea of a 3/4 Masters field and a Pro123, Cat 4/5 instead of the traditional breakdown we see (P123, 4, 5)

My take - there was a time limit on pack finishes.

using local races that lack deep results mean you can't get pack finishes

the definition of pack finish was liberalized about 2 years ago, so most people could get it in most races.

the changes essentially make cat 3 the new cat 4 as without the time limit...

I don't like moving people up without results. dangerous, but not in my hands anymore.

as for 3-2 it doesn't make sense in competitive terms, but if someone who pluigs away with a result here and there for a couple of years can accrue points - then they choose to upgrade, but are then faced with being uncompetitive, unless Cat 2 is the new 3! the rub is automatic upgrade if you accumulate enough points! of course, the races still need to qualify for distance and size.


2-1 won't happen as a gradual process though - wait, the cat 1 upgrade guy is actually quite liberal.


the overall effect is to force people up a category, but the racing won't change.


what was needed was cat 6 or cat 4 / cat 4 masters... Jules' 3/4 masters is probably a good way to go.