May 24, 2018 at 11:01 PM
There goes the neighborhood
It means Charlie will have to show up a bit earlier and move the things before the racing starts.JohnOlsson said:What does this mean for racing in the park? Aside from the new risk of smacking into an immovable object at 35mph.
They look like they have solid concrete bases. If thats true, they must weight at least 500lbs ea. Going to have a closer look at them tomorrow.eloy said:It means Charlie will have to show up a bit earlier and move the things before the racing starts.JohnOlsson said:What does this mean for racing in the park? Aside from the new risk of smacking into an immovable object at 35mph.
They have wheels.JohnOlsson said:They look like they have solid concrete bases. If thats true, they must weight at least 500lbs ea. Going to have a closer look at them tomorrow.eloy said:It means Charlie will have to show up a bit earlier and move the things before the racing starts.JohnOlsson said:What does this mean for racing in the park? Aside from the new risk of smacking into an immovable object at 35mph.
This statement is always true. In any area, anywhere in the USA, or even the world.JohnOlsson said:In the meantime, be cautious! I wonder if the 10mph sign is 'suggested' or a mandatory speed limit. If a cyclist were to hit a pedestrian in those areas, I bet courts would NOT hesitate to use current or even past strava data to prosecute.
This thread has a lot of interesting stuff if you go back far enough. The issue isn't really with the speed it's that the bottom of the hill is a natural spot for pedestrian crossing, and the road is extra wide which makes the crossings longer.JohnOlsson said:obv, was simply pointing out that 'speed limits' have never really been posted/enforced in the park for cyclists.
Reversing the traffic makes total sense. The car-less environment would make it that much easier to make the change.Jules said:This thread has a lot of interesting stuff if you go back far enough. The issue isn't really with the speed it's that the bottom of the hill is a natural spot for pedestrian crossing, and the road is extra wide which makes the crossings longer.JohnOlsson said:obv, was simply pointing out that 'speed limits' have never really been posted/enforced in the park for cyclists.
To make matters worse even if you are traveling the posted limit (30?) by the time you round the corner and see the light you really don't have enough time to stop safely.
The safest thing the park could do would be reverse the flow of traffic completely, and permanently.
as dramatic as the news makes the virus sounds, and as dramatic as it probably really is, the chances of the park pulling permits because of this is zero. COVID-19 does not register in the their radar.Jules said:Anyone care to put odds on spring races getting borked on account of Parks pulling permits because of COVID-19?
all i know is that it is in the plans for 2020JohnOlsson said:when is the repaving occurring?
Mark Taylor said:Was chatting with a friend at the weekend who I sought of lost contact with ,himself a former Kissena
he told me he was running in prospect park
he thought it was amusing that he saw a Kissena rider on the trails , specifically in the protected habitat do not enter area .
if you have to ride these trails , that’s your own judgement , but please don’t do it in Kissena kit