Kissena Forum Archive

In Print: Articles of Interest

5602 comments · 103122 views
Rick Reilly is the worst sports writer out there (Did you read his recent defense of the Redskins? Saying they should change their name is like knowing what's good for Native Americans by putting them on reservations. Srsly). 

I imagine hell consisting of the broadcast team of Jim "the shill" Nance and color commentating by Dick Vitale, with afterword and "insight" provided by fucking Rick Reilly.  Honorable mentions to Joe Buck, Tim McCarver, and Brent Musburger with Pam Oliver on the sidelines for second team suckfest of awful broadcasters.
Don't forget Jim Gray, Billy Packer and that jagoff Colin Cowherd (more of a talk show host than a game broadcaster)
Cover of 9wmag!

image
http://9wmag.com/2013/10/12/whirlybirdin/
the more of these pictures you post, the more i know i must do cross...
Brendan - its 35-40 mins of pure hell and pain, then heckling people after whilst drinking beer and having a donut, how much more fun can you want??
the mud slaloms awaken my inner child
Mud is always appealing and nostalgic.  Get on the bandwagon!
there is only supercross
Another reason not to do TryAthalons.  Oh, except for the re-mount porn.  That'll never get old.

http://espn.go.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/9838319/trouble-surface
^ and tridork climbing porn...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcqIgCJNjto


i think i've seen that video before mark.  a slightly different version:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we9_CdNPuJg
Jules I think the best part about that story was when she passed her
husband in the swim, clinging to life in the cold rigid water, and left him
to die as she continued on in search of a PR.

Nothing better exemplifies the mindset of a triathlete, and the sacrifices
they make just so we can have amazing crash highlight videos to watch on
YouTube for decades to come

M
On Oct 18, 2013 6:10 PM, "Brendan Rigby" <
Wheelmen: don't waste your money. 

Aside from a few new salacious details (hookers and blow, how pedestrian) there is nothing within it that you haven't already read if you have been following the story closely, and a fair bit it fails to shed new light on or skips entirely. 

I feel like a sucker for having spent the ten bucks and few hours it took to read.
There really was nothing there that I didn't already know....cept maybe that big tex isn't as financially sound as I assumed him to be....and I believe his lawyers did not handle the USADA well at all...sounds like he could have gotten a one year ban and had 2 tour titles taken from him...I can only imagine what his legal bills look like.  Floyd is bleeding him dry...pun intended.
all u need:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/10/16/dope-on-wheels-speed-read-of-wheelmen-about-lance-armstrong.html
Some masters just wanna dope:  http://velonews.competitor.com/2013/10/news/is-this-man-a-doper_306150
mugwump said:
What is left unanswered in this article is why this man's diagnosis does not meet the criteria for a TUE? The article says the code says, "“Justification for the use of testosterone must meet the standard of demonstrating an organic cause of androgen deficiency/male hypogonadism. A diagnosis based simply on a functional disorder does not meet this standard … rather, functional diagnoses often focus solely on low testosterone levels and generalized symptoms."

What is it about his diagnosis that does not meet the standards? Must cancer patients demonstrate the "organic cause" of their cancer before their medications may be approved by USADA?


It is frustrating that Beaudin doesn't share this, though I'm guessing that the racer didn't want to share it.  At the same time, there is no rigor behind the Low-T diagnosis.  The New England Journal of Medicine recently posted a study that concluded

"The amount of testosterone required to maintain lean mass, fat mass, strength, and sexual function varied widely in men. Androgen deficiency accounted for decreases in lean mass, muscle size, and strength; estrogen deficiency primarily accounted for increases in body fat; and both contributed to the decline in sexual function. Our findings support changes in the approach to evaluation and management of hypogonadism in men."

In other words, being tired just doesn't cut it.

study: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1206168?query=featured_home&amp;

Think of it this way.  The guy is racing and training hard.  He's feeling tired.  Maybe the problem is he's racing and training too hard.  We don't know the testosterone levels of his competitors; maybe some have lower testosterone than he.  What number is his doctor working off of?  What is his doctor's speciality?  What his his doctor's rationale other than he had a tired patient and he knows that testosterone makes people feel less tired?  Perhaps his doc has been swayed by the millions in advertising that big pharma has paid for that extolls the benefits of testosterone gels.  

There's even research that indicates mental fatigue adversely effects exercise.  Maybe that was his problem.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/02/how-intense-study-may-harm-our-workouts/

I feel for the guy.  USADA takes ten years to catch Armstrong but when this mid-pack wannabe shows up with his papers in hand they just go "meh, not our problem, our rules don't cover you"

Good thing 60% of their roll call isn't in the 40+ demographic... oh wait... nevermind.

Also, "ass-hatchet"

How may times do you read that in a given day?
Jules, 
they didn't tell him that at all. They told him, 'this diagnosis isn't enough. Try to find the cause.  If you can, we'll be happy to reconsider.'  He decided he didn't like that answer, so he's going public to rally support.  Strikes me he either decided not to look deeper or hasn't been able to find anything deeper.  

I think you should be happy with their actions. The low-t diagnosis is increasing in popularity.  And there's next to no scientific rigor to support it.

I'm also confused by the low bone density and testosterone therapy.  there are plenty of drug regimens that don't rely on testosterone.  He could have easily discontinued T and worked with the other drugs.

But he does get kudos for ass hatchet.
"articles of interest" or "close encounters...?"

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/21/how-safe-is-cycling-its-hard-to-say/?hpw
@Jules-Funny...I know that guy Rob that they interview from Boulder.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/nys-calls-for-radios-and-helmet-cameras-in-cyclo-cross

"Why can’t I wear a helmet camera? Or use earpieces to communicate with the mechanics?" Nys asked in his weekly column in the Gazet van Antwerpen newspaper, Sporza reported.
Oy
On Oct 22, 2013 11:19 AM, "Phillip Maronilla" <
mugwump said:
My response

http://jralong.blogspot.com/2013/10/problems-with-this-testosterone-tue.html
mugwump said:
I really enjoyed reading this, and think there are some excellent points made. Although I must confess that my first reaction to it was that he wrote this like he rides the streets of New Jersey. Namely heading to a traffic light and or corner, JP assumes that the coast is going to be clear. And it really feels like, despite making caveats saying otherwise, he assumes this guy and his doctor are being shifty. But it's a blog, an opinion piece so that's not a critique, it's just a comment.
watch live: http://www.sixdayracing.com/About-Six-Day/
mugwump said:
I really enjoyed reading this, and think there are some excellent points made. Although I must confess that my first reaction to it was that he wrote this like he rides the streets of New Jersey. Namely heading to a traffic light and or corner, JP assumes that the coast is going to be clear. And it really feels like, despite making caveats saying otherwise, he assumes this guy and his doctor are being shifty. But it's a blog, an opinion piece so that's not a critique, it's just a comment.
thanks.

I was trying to suggest that at the very least there was either a lack of candor on the part of the racer and doc and/or a lack of inquiry from the reporter.  I fely that the VN article created a very simple X versus Y narrative without examining the claims carefully.  In refusing to dig, the article leaves the reader barely any wiser for the effort.  This is one of the many places where refusing to take a position does the reader a disservice.
Yeah, totally agree...it's almost a good article on VN. But if you are going to write the story, you gotta answer all the obvious questions.

Only Malcolm Gladwell is allowed to write things that raise more questions than they answer!